But he didn't say anything.
I left after a half hour of the fifty-minute lecture, during which time he had established several times that he has spoken at several big events, that people have called him after and that he tells them he is not a therapist and can't heal them but that he is a "trench warrior" against pornography, that he went to the prison and spoke to people, and that the prisoners wanted to talk to him after...and after thirty minutes, I left wondering, "so what did you talk to them ABOUT?"
We had a stake conference last weekend with a similar kind of speaker. A speaker who talked about how many people he knew but who never really got to a point. I am disappointed by these speakers. I am disappointed if they think that they have enough experience that they do not have to prepare. Speakers should have a thesis statement and a plan to support it. If people--be it twenty or two thousand--are going to invest their time listening to you, you should at least have a point.